How is BAS different from a vulnerability scan?

A scan finds vulnerabilities; BAS validates your defenses by running real MITRE ATT&CK techniques to see if attacks would succeed against your controls.

Is it safe to run in production?

Yes. Simulations are designed to be production-aware and non-disruptive, validating controls without harming your systems.

How fast are gaps reported?

Immediately on confirmation, via email, SMS or phone, with SIEM/WAF export so your team can respond the same day.

ImmuniWeb Use CasesContinuous Breach and Attack Simulation Services

Continuous Breach and Attack Simulation Services

Propulsé par ImmuniWeb Discovery

Vérifiez que vos défenses fonctionnent réellement. ImmuniWeb® Continuous effectue des simulations de violation et d’attaque contre votre infrastructure web et vos applications 24h/24 et 7j/7, en utilisant des attaques réelles issues de la matrice MITRE ATT&CK pertinentes pour votre secteur — en toute sécurité, en continu et avec un SLA contractuel garantissant zéro faux positifs.

MITRE ATT&CK Scenariosreal-life, industry-relevant attacks

Validate Your Controlssafely and continuously

Alertes instantanéesby email, SMS or phone on confirmation

SLA zéro faux positifmoney-back guarantee

Demo Download ImmuniWeb Presentation

Why Breach and Attack Simulation Is a Business Resilience Lever

You've invested in WAFs, EDR and monitoring — but when did you last prove they stop a real attack? BAS continuously tests your defenses against the techniques attackers actually use, surfacing the gaps before they're exploited and turning security spend into demonstrable, measurable protection your board can trust.

Tableau comparatif:

Avec Continuous BAS

Security controls proven against real techniques
Detection and prevention gaps found continuously
Instant alerts enable same-day fixes
Measurable resilience trend over time
Zero false positives — alerts are real

Without Breach & Attack Simulation

Controls assumed to work, never verified
Gaps discovered only during a real breach
Blind spots persist between annual tests
No evidence that investments pay off
Noise that erodes trust in tooling

Vulnerability Scanning vs Breach and Attack Simulation

	Vulnerability Scanning	Breach & Attack Simulation
Question Answered	What vulnerabilities exist?	Do my defenses stop real attacks?
Focus	Finding flaws	Validating controls
Cadence	Snapshot	Continuous, 24/7
Technique	Signature checks	Real MITRE ATT&CK scenarios
Idéal pour	Hygiene and patching	Proving security efficacy

Recommendation: Scanning tells you what's vulnerable; BAS tells you whether an attacker could actually succeed against your controls. The two are complementary — fix the flaws you find, and continuously validate that your detection and prevention hold up. ImmuniWeb® Continuous runs BAS safely against the TTPs relevant to your industry.

Breach and Attack Simulation Scope

We continuously simulate real attacks across four dimensions:

Attack Simulation

Real-life scenarios from MITRE ATT&CK
Industry-relevant threat-actor techniques
Web infrastructure and application targets
Safe, production-aware execution

Control Validation

WAF, filtering and prevention efficacy
Detection and alerting coverage
Vérifications de segmentation et de contrôle d'accès
Configuration and hardening validation

Detection & Alerting

Hybrid AI + human validation of findings
Instant alerts by email, SMS or phone
Threat-aware risk scoring
Zero false positives, money-back guarantee

Assurance & Standards

Continuous resilience metrics over time
SIEM and WAF integration
Support de conformité pour DORA, NIS 2 et PCI DSS
Free retesting after remediation

MITRE ATT&CK Techniques We Simulate

Reconnaissance

We simulate scanning to test exposure detection.

Initial Access

We test whether entry techniques are blocked.

Exécution

We validate controls against adversary execution.

Persistence

Nous vérifions si les points d'appui seraient détectés.

Privilege Escalation

We test escalation-prevention controls.

Defense Evasion

Nous testons si l'évasion contourne la détection.

Credential Access

Nous validons les contrôles de protection des identifiants.

Discovery

We test internal-enumeration detection.

Lateral Movement

We validate segmentation and movement controls.

Exfiltration

We test whether data egress is detected and blocked.

The Continuous BAS Workflow

Intégration et sélection des scénarios

We select MITRE ATT&CK scenarios relevant to you. Artifact: a configured scenario set and scope.

Phase 1

Phase 2

Simulation continue

Scenarios run 24/7, safely, against your environment. Artifact: a continuous stream of results.

Control-Efficacy Validation

We measure whether controls detect and block. Artifact: a control-efficacy assessment.

Phase 3

Phase 4

Human Validation

Analysts confirm gaps and remove noise. Artifact: a verified, false-positive-free finding.

Instant Alerting

You are alerted immediately when a gap is confirmed. Artifact: an actionable alert with guidance.

Phase 5

Phase 6

Reporting & Trend Tracking

Nous rapportons et suivons la résilience dans le temps. Artifact: indicateurs de résilience et rétests.

Real-Time Alerting & Continuous Control Assurance

BAS turns control validation into an always-on signal. The moment a defensive gap is confirmed, you are alerted by email, SMS or phone, and findings export to your SIEM and WAF so your team can tune controls the same day. Instead of assuming your defenses work, you continuously prove it against the TTPs that matter to your industry.

Industry-Specific Attack Simulation

We align simulated attacks to the threats your sector faces:

Financial Services & FinTech

Continuous validation of controls against fraud and intrusion TTPs under DORA and PCI DSS.

Critical Infrastructure & Utilities

Always-on control validation for high-impact environments aligned with NIS 2.

SaaS & Enterprise

Continuous testing of detection and segmentation across web and application infrastructure.

Foire aux questions

Q

Qu'est-ce que la simulation de violation et d'attaque?

A

BAS continuously and safely simulates real attack techniques against your environment to validate whether your security controls actually detect and block them.
Q

How is BAS different from a vulnerability scan?

A

A scan finds vulnerabilities; BAS validates your defenses by running real MITRE ATT&CK techniques to see if attacks would succeed against your controls.
Q

Is it safe to run in production?

A

Yes. Simulations are designed to be production-aware and non-disruptive, validating controls without harming your systems.
Q

How fast are gaps reported?

A

Dès confirmation, par e-mail, SMS ou téléphone, avec export SIEM/WAF afin que votre équipe puisse réagir le jour même.